Register for the course
Beyond the Green Tick: Measuring Critical Control Health
Moving from Paper-Based Compliance to Real-World Control Reliability
A Free Interactive Webinar hosted by the Art of Work Academy. Register Free
Is your safety system actually protecting your people, or is it just protecting your paperwork?
Every week, directors and safety leaders review dashboards filled with "green ticks". Audits are signed off, scheduled inspections are completed, and compliance reports look perfect. Yet, catastrophic incidents continue to occur in systems where every single box was ticked.
The hard truth is that traditional binary audits are blind to the "drift to failure." Over time, temporary workarounds quietly become permanent. Exclusion zones shrink due to congestion, safety features are bypassed to hit production targets, and critical controls degrade silently right under the nose of your compliance schedule.
In this free, highly practical webinar, the Art of Work Academy challenges the conventional compliance norm. We will show you how to move away from retrospective, paper-based check-boxes and build a proactive operating system focused on real-world control reliability.
What We Will Cover
1. The Compliance Gap: Work-as-Disclosed vs. Work-as-Done
The Paper Illusion: Why activity counts and administrative checklists fail to prove control effectiveness or discharge your legal due diligence.
The 62% Default Trap: Why operations lacking capital or bandwidth continuously default to weak administrative "support" controls (like procedures and training) rather than robust engineering barriers, and how this leaves your organisation exposed.
2. The Four Dimensions of Reliability
Learn to evaluate your critical controls using a multi-dimensional framework that looks at how work actually happens at the coalface:
Robustness & Human Dependency: How to balance the physical engineering strength of a barrier against the cognitive load and memory required for a human to operate it.
Alignment & Adaptability: Do your safety controls actually help workers complete their tasks, or do they hinder them? How do these controls perform under "edge cases" like abnormal weather, contractor shifts, or high-pressure situations?
Interrogating the Divergence: Why the gap between what subject matter experts design (work-as-imagined) and what frontline operators experience (work-as-done) is the single most important safety metric you aren't measuring.
3. The Mindset Shift: Compliance vs. Reliability
The Old Test (Compliance) - The New Test (Reliability)
Hendrik Lourens
Hendrik is an expert in Systems Thinking and operational turnarounds with extensive director-level experience in manufacturing and P&L management. He has consulted across major sectors, including mining, construction, aviation, and manufacturing, helping organizations maximize performance through targeted leverage points. At Art of Work, he leads Collective Improvement initiatives—combining Safety Differently with Systems Thinking—for industry-leading organizations such as Qantas, CPB, John Holland, and McConnell Dowell. Hendrik holds a Master’s in Polymer Science, degrees in Physics and Chemistry, an MBA, and full accreditation in the Theory of Constraints.
Kelvin Genn
Role: Managing Director at Art of Work
Kelvin is a founder of Safety Differently, co-creator of the Due Diligence Index, and a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Health and Safety. A strategic systems practitioner with a background in Human Factors and organizational re-engineering, his career includes 10 years in the Royal Australian Air Force, leading risk management globally for Compass Group Plc, and serving as Global General Manager for Safety and Wellness at Sinclair Knight Merz (SKM). Additionally, Kelvin has shaped national healthcare safety standards as Director for Clinical Quality and Patient Safety for NSW Health and through his work with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care.
Who is this for?
This session is designed specifically for Safety Professionals, Operations Directors, and Engineers who are ready to challenge standard safety bureaucracy and build highly defensible, operationally reliable evidence of due diligence.